Prediction of Michal Przysiezny vs Tobias Kamke Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Przysiezny vs T. Kamke

Michal Przysiezny

POL

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$403.6K

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Tobias Kamke

GER

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$403.6K

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Przysiezny 1 - 2 Kamke

They have played 6 sets in total, with Michal Przysiezny winning 2 and Tobias Kamke winning 4. The last match between Tobias Kamke and Michal Przysiezny was at the Kyoto Challenger, 22-02-2018, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Tobias Kamke getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Przysiezny	1
Kamke	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) Kyoto Challenger(02-22-18)

Stats

Tobias Kamke

Michal Przysiezny

(R1) Surbiton Challenger(06-07-16)

Stats

Tobias Kamke

Michal Przysiezny

(SF) Kazan Challenger(02-06-10)

Stats

Michal Przysiezny

Tobias Kamke

M. Przysiezny vs T. Kamke H2H Profile

M. Przysiezny	Stats	T. Kamke
$403,630	Career Prize Money	$1,074,711
55.82% (465-368)	Career Total W/L	53.18% (552-486)
0	Grass	1
1	Indoor	1
16	Titles	11
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Przysiezny vs T. Kamke Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michal Przysiezny has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tobias Kamke has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michal Przysiezny, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tobias Kamke has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Michal Przysiezny has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tobias Kamke has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Michal Przysiezny has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tobias Kamke winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Michal Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/93). Tobias Kamke has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 165/127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 123/123).
Player level: In the last year, Michal Przysiezny has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tobias Kamke has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Michal Przysiezny winning 1 times and Tobias Kamke being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Michal Przysiezny winning 2 and Tobias Kamke winning 4.
The last match between Michal Przysiezny and Tobias Kamke was at the Kyoto Challenger, 22-02-2018, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Tobias Kamke getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:14.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michal Przysiezny has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tobias Kamke has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michal Przysiezny has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tobias Kamke has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Michal Przysiezny has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tobias Kamke has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Michal Przysiezny vs Tobias Kamke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Przysiezny vs T. Kamke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Przysiezny	Stats	T. Kamke
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	4
25	Games Won	31
11	Aces (Total)	7
8	Total Double Faults	1
0:45:14	Average Match Time	0:45:14
53% (59/111)	1st Serve %	60% (64/107)
71% (42/59)	1st Serve Win %	83% (53/64)
44% (23/52)	2nd Serve Win %	67% (29/43)
0% (0/7)	Break Pts Won %	56% (5/9)
23% (25/107)	Return Points Win %	41% (46/111)
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Przysiezny Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sopot Challenger - 29-07-2019
R1 Daniel MichalskiD. Michalski	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Monterrey Challenger - 01-04-2019
R1 Daniel Elahi GalanD. Elahi	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Budapest Challenger - 04-02-2019
R1 Zsombor PirosZ. Piros	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Nussloch - 21-01-2019
R1 Alexander ErlerA. Erler	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
Koblenz Challenger - 14-01-2019
R2 Tallon GriekspoorT. Griekspoor	L	6-0 2-6 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Kamke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Luedenscheid Challenger - 27-06-2022
R1 Marko TopoM. Topo	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Oeiras 3 Challenger - 20-06-2022
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 ret.	Stats
R1 Tiago CacaoT. Cacao	W	6-7(7) 6-2 6-4	Stats
Prague 2 Challenger - 02-05-2022
Q3 Daniel MichalskiD. Michalski	L	w/o	Stats
Q1 Marek GengelM. Gengel	W	6-4 1-6 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Przysiezny vs T. Kamke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Przysiezny	Stats	T. Kamke
55.82% (465/368)	YTD Win/Loss	53.18% (552/486)
54.33% (1079/907)	Sets Win/Loss	52.93% (1265/1125)
51.71% (10032/9367)	Games Win/Loss	51.52% (11576/10895)
49.73% (92/93)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (123/123)
52.24% (140/128)	Clay Win/Loss	51.74% (193/180)
62.09% (208/127)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.86% (199/151)
55.56% (25/20)	Grass Win/Loss	53.62% (37/32)
0.32	Aces Per Game	0.13
3053	Aces Total	1397
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
1304	Total Double Faults	2187
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
78.27	Average Opponent Rank	599.94
60% (17992/29764)	1st Serve %	59% (29278/49843)
74% (13300/17992)	1st Serve Win %	68% (19771/29278)
51% (5981/11772)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (10479/20565)
39% (857/2180)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (2160/5131)
35% (9721/28096)	Return Points Win %	40% (20118/50099)
52.00% (26/24)	Slam W/L	47.42% (46/51)
42.86% (6/8)	Masters W/L	34.78% (16/30)
38.46% (10/16)	Cups W/L	33.33% (1/2)
43.14% (66/87)	Main Tour W/L	45.02% (95/116)
57.76% (253/185)	Challenger W/L	57.07% (335/252)
68.42% (104/48)	Futures W/L	62.77% (59/35)
58% (448/774)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (524/977)
31% (13/42)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	34% (14/41)
53% (199/377)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (136/288)
55% (154/278)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (125/273)
84% (442/370)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (573/481)
16% (442/70)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (573/92)
24% (391/95)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (464/68)